4.3 Review

The association between acid-suppressive agent use and the risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 76, 期 10, 页码 1437-1456

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-02927-8

关键词

Acid-suppressive agent; Cancer; Proton pump inhibitor; Histamine 2-receptor antagonist; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Postdoctoral Research Program of Sungkyunkwan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Acid-suppressive agents (ASAs) may be associated with cancer; previous studies reported that the risk of cancer with acid suppressants has differed depending on the site of cancer. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between ASA use and the type of cancer risk. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched for publications up to the end of September 2019 for MeSH terms and text words related to cancer and ASAs. Studies on the association between ASAs and cancer risk, which included a control group and reported the relative risk of cancer, were included. The inverse-variance random effect model was used to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), and subgroup analysis for type of acid suppressants, drug uptake duration, and cumulative doses was performed. Heterogeneity was assessed using theI(2)test andQstatistic. Results Thirty-nine cohort and case-control studies were included. ASA use was found to be significantly associated with a 46% higher risk of gastric cancer (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.18-1.80) and a 53% higher risk of liver cancer (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31-1.78) compared with nonuse; however, there was no significant association for esophageal, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, breast, prostate, and kidney cancer; melanoma; and lymphoma. Conclusions ASAs were significantly associated with an increased risk of gastric and liver cancer; therefore, special attention of ASA use considering the potential risk of gastric and liver cancer is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据