4.7 Article

Outstanding clinical efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 150-158

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.029

关键词

Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma; PD-L1 expression; PD-1 inhibitors; PD-L1 inhibitors

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We evaluated programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma (PC). Methods: We created two cohorts of patients diagnosed with pulmonary PC from 2016 to 2019, PD-L1 expression and programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy cohorts. The PD-L1 expression cohort included all patients evaluated for PD-L1 expression, irrespective of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. High PD-L1 expression was defined as >= 50% positive tumour cells (TC) for 22C3, >= 25% for SP263 or >= 10%/5% TC/immune cell (IC) for SP142. The PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy cohort included patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, irrespective of PD-L1 tests. Results: One hundred twenty-five of 175 patients diagnosed with pulmonary PCs were included in the PD-L1 expression cohort. Among them, 112 patients (89.6%) had PD-L1-positive (>= 1%) tumours and 100 (80.0%) had tumours with high PD-L1 expression. A total of 49 patients were included in the efficacy cohort: 40 received pembrolizumab, 7 nivolumab and 2 atezolizumab. The objective response rate was 49.0%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.2 months and a median overall survival of 22.2 months. In the efficacy cohort, high PD-L1 expression (n = 41) was associated with longer PFS (median: 7.2 versus 1.5 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53 [0.22-1.29], p = 0.16) and overall survival (median: 22.2 versus 3.5, HR: 0.21 [0.08-0.57], p = 0.001) than low/negative/unknown PD-L1 expression (n = 8). Conclusion: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors show outstanding efficacy for pulmonary PCs, and this is possibly attributable to high PD-L1 expression in these tumours. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据