4.5 Article

Targeted analysis for detection the adulteration in extra virgin olive oil's using LC-DAD/ESI-MS/MS and combined with chemometrics tools

期刊

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 246, 期 8, 页码 1661-1677

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-020-03522-y

关键词

Extra virgin olive oil adulteration; Refined pomace olive oil; Correlation analysis; Phenolic compounds; LC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS; Chemometrics

资金

  1. Ministere de l'Enseingement Superieur et de la Recherche Scientifique, Tunisia [LR14ES08]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education-Tunisia [Arimnet2/0001/2015]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [ARIMNET2/0001/2015] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hand-held LC-DAD/ESI-MS/MS approach was employed, for the first time, for the quantification of extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) adulteration with refined pomace olive oil (RPOO). The total polyphenols (TP) and sterols were quantified according to their chemical methods, with more reliable methods required in this field to avoid undue dependence on chlorophylls, carotenoids contents and antioxidant activity (DPPH assays), which were evaluated by spectrophotometric methods. Some differences concerning the antioxidant activity and the TP content were observed. Actually, Chemlali EVOO activity was the most pronounced (13.84 +/- 0.21%) and it contained the highest TP content (284.54 +/- 4.27 mg/kg). Indeed, a correlation between antioxidant activity, TP and oxidative stability was established herewith. The metabolomics data were elaborated with the help of chemometric tools i.e. principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). This approach allowed the estimation of the best discrimination markers for EVOO authenticity evaluation (i.e. Hydroxytyrosol quinone, oxidized hydroxytyrosol, 3,4-DHPEA-EA, p-HPEA (tyrosol), p-coumaric acid, luteolin, decarboxymethyl 10-hydroxyoleuropein aglycon, beta-sitosterol apparently; campesterol, stigmasterol, increment Delta-7-stigmastenol and increment Delta-7-avenasterol). [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据