4.5 Article

Will you agree to treat a suicidal adolescent? A comparative study among mental health professionals

期刊

EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 671-680

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-020-01581-w

关键词

Adolescence; Suicide; Suicidal behavior; Countertransference; Therapist

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that mental health professionals are less willing to treat highly suicidal adolescents and more likely to refer them, regardless of the patient's gender. Professional factors, countertransference, and trait-like suicide ideations positively contribute to the willingness to accept the patient.
The effect of a therapist's personal and professional variables on their decision to treat or refer a suicidal adolescent was studied. 242 mental health professionals were randomly exposed to one of four case descriptions of an adolescent in crisis. The cases shared a common background story, however differed in suicidal condition (high vs. low) and gender. The questionnaires employed aimed to reflect the subject's evaluation of the patient's suicidal severity, countertransference, suicidal ideation, depression, professional competence, and seniority. Subjects were asked about their willingness to treat or likeliness to refer the case. Results indicate a lower willingness to treat and higher tendency to refer highly suicidal adolescents regardless of gender. Professional factors, countertransference, and trait-like suicide ideations positively contributed to willingness to accept the patient. Mental health professionals are unwilling to accept adolescents at risk for suicide for treatment. Nevertheless, professional factors contribute to the willingness to treat such adolescents, thereby underlining the importance of improving skills and tools with regard to the treatment of suicidal behavior. Acquaintance with a similar adolescent is a positive contributor for accepting a potentially suicidal adolescent patient to therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据