4.5 Article

The evaluation of adding induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
卷 278, 期 5, 页码 1545-1558

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06218-x

关键词

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Induction chemotherapy; Chemoradiotherapy; Randomized controlled trials; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Induction chemotherapy followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival outcomes for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared to cisplatin-based CCRT alone, but is also associated with a markedly increased risk of treatment-related adverse events.
Purpose We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus cisplatin-based CCRT for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). Methods We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase until February 29, 2020, for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The quality of the studies was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. The following outcomes of interest were analyzed: 1) progression-free survival (PFS); 2) overall survival (OS); 3) distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS); 4) locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS); and 5) any grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs). The data were pooled with the use of hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs). Subgroup, heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results After screening all studies selected from the initial search, seven trials with 2233 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to cisplatin-based CCRT alone, there was reliable evidence that IC significantly improved PFS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.75,P < 0.00001), OS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83,P = 0.002), DMFS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.79,P < 0.0001) and LRFFS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88,P = 0.003) and was associated with a markedly increased risk of AEs (grade 3/4) during the IC and CCRT phases. No significant difference in the incidence of late AEs (grade 3/4) was observed between different arms. Conclusion Compared to cisplatin-based CCRT alone, IC followed by cisplatin-based CCRT confers real and substantial favorable survival outcomes with controllable toxicities. Therefore, it is reasonable to define IC followed by cisplatin-based CCRT as one of the standard treatment strategies for patients with LA-NPC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据