4.5 Article

Morphology disentangles the systematics of a ubiquitous but elusive meiofaunal group (Kinorhyncha: Pycnophyidae)

期刊

CLADISTICS
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 479-505

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cla.12143

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Government of Spain [CGL 2005-04310, CGL 2009-08928, CGL 2013-42908-P]
  2. SYNTHESYS Project
  3. European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 Capacities Program [DK-TAF-1708, DK-TAF-3667]
  4. European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 ASSEMBLE grant [2013_01_0035]
  5. International Research Hub Project for Climate Change and Coral Reef/Island Dynamics from the University of the Ryukyus
  6. Research Institute of Marine Invertebrates, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kinorhyncha is a group of benthic, microscopic animals distributed worldwide in marine sediments. The phylum is divided into two classes, Cyclorhagida and Allomalorhagida, congruent with the two major clades recovered in recent phylogenetic analyses. Allomalorhagida accommodates more than one-third of the described species, most of them assigned to the family Pycnophyidae. All previous phylogenetic analyses of the phylum recovered the two genera within Pycnophyidae, Pycnophyes and Kinorhynchus, as paraphyletic and polyphyletic. A major problem in these studies was the lack of molecular data of most pycnophyids, due to the limited and highly localized distribution of most species, often in the Arctic and the deep-sea. We here overcame the problem by adding a morphological partition with data for 79 Pycnophyidae species, 15 of them also represented by molecular data. Model-based analyses yielded seven clades, which each was supported by several morphological apomorphies. Accordingly, Kinorhynchus is synonymized with Pycnophyes and six new genera are described for the remaining recovered clades: Leiocanthus gen. nov., Cristaphyes gen. nov., Higginsium gen. nov., Krakenella gen. nov., Setaphyes gen. nov. and Fujuriphyes gen. nov.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据