4.7 Review

Producing electrical energy in microbial fuel cells based on sulphate reduction: a review

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 29, 页码 36075-36084

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09728-7

关键词

Bioelectrochemistry; Anaerobic digestion; Sulphate-reducing bacteria; Biofuel; Wastewater; Industrial effluents

资金

  1. Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
  2. Universidade Federal de Sao Joao del-Rei
  3. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  4. FAPEMIG (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais)
  5. FINEP (Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos)
  6. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  7. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combination of the treatment of effluents with high organic loads and the production of electricity is the driving forces stimulating the development of microbial fuel cells (MFC). The increase in electricity production in MFCs requires not only the optimization of the operational parameters but also the inhibition of the metabolic pathways, which compete with electricity production, such as methanogenesis. The presence of both sulphate and sulphide ions in conventional anaerobic reactors hampers the growth of methanogenic archaea and justifies the use of sulphate and therefore sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in the anodic half-cell of MFC. Most importantly, the literature on the subject reveals that SRB are able to directly transfer electrons to solid electrodes, enabling the production of electrical energy. This technology is versatile because it associates the removal of both sulphate and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) with the production of electricity. Therefore, the current work revises the main aspects related to the inoculation of MFC with SRB focusing on (i) the microbial interactions in the anodic chamber, (ii) the electron transfer pathways to the solid anode, and also (iii) the sulphate and COD removal yields along with the electricity production efficiencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据