4.7 Article

Biochemical oxygen demand prediction: development of hybrid wavelet-random forest and M5 model tree approach using feature selection algorithms

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 27, 页码 34322-34336

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09457-x

关键词

BOD modeling; RF algorithm; M5 model tree; Wavelet transform; Feature selection; Karun River

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supplying adequate water to individuals and maintaining water supplies to support human life, particularly to rapidly urbanizing communities, are of paramount importance in the development of urban areas in each country worldwide. In turn, maintaining water resource quality and avoiding permanent damage as a consequence of environmental pollution and unsustainable off-take from sources such as rivers and aquifers should be considered as important as the water supply quantity. In this study, random forest (RF) and M5 model tree (M5) models were used to predict water biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). Having decomposed the input variables by wavelet transform, based on the feature selection algorithms (FS) (relief (RA), correlation (CA), principal component analysis (PCA), and ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithms), the important components were recognized and inserted into the RF and M5 models. The proposed approach was applied to Karun River in Ahvaz station on a monthly basis from 2006 to 2018. The results showed that the RF model had better performance withR= 0.872, MAE = 0.0312, and RMSE = 0.0332 values for the variable of BOD compared with the M5 model withR= 0.751, MAE = 0.0377, and RMSE = 0.0468 values. In addition, comparing RF and hybrid models, the purposed hybrid models were considered as viable options to improve the prediction accuracy of BOD. The findings also showed that, among the hybrid models, the WRF-PCA model withR= 0.927, MAE = 0.0198, and RMSE = 0.0241 values was the best model for the prediction of BOD values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据