4.7 Article

Compartmentation and effects of lead (Pb) in the collembolan,Folsomia candida

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 35, 页码 43638-43645

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10300-6

关键词

Heavy metal; Reproduction; Growth; Gut; Internal concentration; Risk assessment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41977136]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201806990032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of soil lead (Pb) pollution on survival, growth, and reproduction of the collembolan,Folsomia candida, and Pb compartmentation in its gut and remaining body parts were studied by exposing animals to laboratory-spiked soil. The survival, growth, and reproduction ofF. candidawere significantly reduced by increasing soil Pb concentration. The LC(50)values of survival based on total and CaCl2-extractable Pb concentration in soil were 2562 mg kg(-1)and 351 mg kg(-1), respectively. The EC(50)values of reproduction were 1244 mg kg(-1)and 48 mg kg(-1), respectively. The Pb concentration in whole body, gut, and remaining body parts was significantly increased with the increase of soil Pb concentration and followed an exponential increase when the soil Pb concentration was equal to or above a threshold (1000 mg kg(-1)for whole body and remaining body part, 500 mg kg(-1)for gut). Below this threshold, these relationships were linear. The Pb concentration in the gut was higher than whole body and remaining body part ofF. candida, and the threshold of internal Pb concentration at whichF. candidacan compensate was in the range 7-13 mg Pb kg(-1)dry animal (corresponding to soil Pb concentration 500-1000 mg Pb kg(-1)dry soil). The results indicate that reproduction ofF. candidawas a more sensitive indicator of lead toxicity than survival and growth. Pb was mainly accumulated in the gut ofF. candida.We discuss the internal Pb concentration as an indicator of adverse effects in the risk assessment of soil Pb pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据