4.7 Article

Electron transfer pathways and kinetic analysis of cathodic simultaneous nitrification and denitrification process in microbial fuel cell system

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109505

关键词

Microbial fuel cell; Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification; Electron transfer pathways; Kinetic model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is an innovative bioconversion technology for wastewater treatment accompanied with electricity recovery. In this study, a kinetic model was developed base on Activated Sludge Model No.1 (ASM1) to describe electron transfer pathways during the simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) process in the biocathode system of a dual-chamber MFC. The batch running of the dual-chamber MFC system showed that it produced a power density up to 2.96 W m(-3) within 48 h, the achieved SND efficiency and autotrophic denitrification ratio in the cathodic denitrification process were up to 87.3 +/- 0.8% and 69.5 +/- 6.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, by integrating nitrification, autotrophic denitrification, heterotrophic denitrification, organic carbon oxidation, and oxygen reduction in the cathode, the model was able to precisely fit the concentration variations of NH3-N, dissolved oxygen (DO) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) during the cathodic SND process (R-2 >= 0.9876). The cathode electrons tended to be completely utilized with the increase of autotrophic denitrification ratio in the cathodic denitrification process. When the nitrification rate was enhanced, the autotrophic denitrification would prevail in the competition with the heterotrophic denitrification. In summary, the developed model was confirmed to be effective and reliable for describing the electron transfer pathways and predicting the performance of the nitrogen removal reactions during the cathodic SND process in a double-chamber MFC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据