4.7 Article

Management of water quality targets based on river-lake water quality response relationships for lake basins - A case study of Dianchi Lake

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109479

关键词

SWAT; EFDC; Management of water quality target; Precision pollution treatment; Dianchi Lake

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Project of Kunming

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a lake basin, there is a mismatch between river and lake water quality targets and a method for setting specific water quality targets for these rivers is urgently needed. Using Dianchi Lake as an example, we proposed a lake basin water quality management system based on the river-lake water quality response relationship, coupled with a Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) basin hydrological model and Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) lake water quality hydrodynamic model. River water quality control requirements based on the river-lake water quality response were proposed, under the premise that the Dianchi Lake water quality reaches the required standard. Then, water quality control targets for rivers were determined, and corrected for influencing factors, such as current river water quality and composition of flow. Our systematic approach efficiently identified key lake basin pollution sources, and accurately located key points for water quality improvement and pollution control. Combined with a correction for clean water source and current water quality of each river, the proposed water quality targets were practical and operable. Meanwhile, the EFDC model was used to verify the entire process to ensure that river water quality targets could be set to achieve lake water quality targets. To ensure that Dianchi Lake water quality can reach Class IV standard, the Chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration would need to be maintained under 30 mg/L,Waihai total nitrogen (TN) below 7 mg/L, total phosphorus (TP) below 0.2 mg/L, and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) below 2 mg/L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据