4.7 Article

Efficient antimony removal by self-assembled core-shell nanocomposite of Co3O4@rGO and the analysis of its adsorption mechanism

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109657

关键词

Antimony removal; Adsorption; Co3O4@rGO; Core-shell nanocomposite; Waste water treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978323, 51668046]
  2. International Cooperation and Exchange NSFC [51720105001]
  3. Science Foundation for Young Scientists of Jiangxi Province-Key Project [2017ACB21034]
  4. Nanchang Hangkong University Innovation and Entrepreneurship Course Cultivation Project [KCPY 1806]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co3O4@rGO were facilely prepared by template free self-assemble in this study. The morphology of Co3O4@rGO was actiniaria-like core-shell structural nanocomposites. The formation mechanism of Co3O4@rGO core-shell nanocomposite was discussed according to its significant time-dependent morphology evolution course. To evaluate the application potential of Co3O4@rGO, its adsorption performance toward highly toxic antimony ions were studied. The Co3O4@rGO nanocomposite exhibit high anti-interference ability and high adsorption ability. The maximum adsorption capacities towards Sb(III) and Sb(V) are 151.04 and 165.51 mg/g, respectively. River water samples containing antimony violating the limit were used to evaluate the practical application of Co3O4@rGO, and high performance was achieved. The EU and China limits for antimony in drinking water can be met by using mesoporous Co3O4@rGO treating the actual river water samples with original antimony concentration lower than 50 mu g/L. Adsorption isotherm, adsorption kinetics, pH and co-existing ions effects were also studied in details. The results indicate that mesoporous Co3O4@rGO is an excellent adsorbent for antimony removal. Mesoporous Co3O4@rGO nanocomposite is a potential candidate for antimony removal from waste water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据