4.7 Article

Influences of soil properties and long-time aging on phytotoxicity of antimony to barley root elongation

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114330

关键词

Antimony phytotoxicity; Soil properties; Long-time aging; Adsorption; Oxidation reaction

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFD0800905, 2016YFD0800400]
  2. Special Environmental Protection Foundation for Public Welfare Projects [201509032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antimony (Sb) is a toxic element of global concern. To date, the most previous researches about phytotoxicity of Sb failed to fully consider the effects of soil properties and long-time aging. To address this, the toxicity of exogenous Sb(III) and Sb(V) were studied using the standardized barley root elongation bioassay. The results indicated that in ten soils aged only for 1 d, the EC10 (concentrations causing 10% inhibition) values were 221-3164 mg kg(-1) and 135-4260 mg kg(-1) in Sb(III)- and Sb(V)- treated soils, respectively. The EC50 values (concentrations causing 50% inhibition) were more than the setting highest concentration of 6400 mg kg(-1) in half of ten soils. The regression analysis showed that the amorphous Fe oxide and pH were the most foremost single soil factor explaining above-mentioned variance in EC10, respectively, which suggested that the dominant soil factors were related to Sb forms. The inclusion of amorphous Mn oxide in above these two simple regression model could best explain the toxicity variance. After aged for 116 and 365 d, the phytotoxicity of Sb in Sb-treated soils significantly decreased and the phytotoxicity were even not found in the majority of Sb(V)-treated soils. The extent of aging varied with soils, and correlation analysis indicated that the aging effects negatively correlated with soil pH and positively correlated with clay and amorphous Al oxide in the Sb(III)-treated test soils. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据