4.7 Article

Cadmium foliar application affects wheat Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn accumulation

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114329

关键词

Wheat; Foliar application; Cd; Zn; Grain; Phloem

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Programs of China [2016YFE0106400, 2018YFD0800304]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471253]
  3. Open Fund of Key Laboratory for Monitoring and Remediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Soils of Henan Province [2017204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cadmium is toxic to plants, easily reaching unsafe levels for animal and human consumption. A greenhouse experiment investigated the effect of foliar-applied Cd on the accumulation and distribution of Cd, Zn, Cu and Pb in wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown in heavy metal-contaminated soil. Cadmium solutions (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 mg L-1) were repeatedly sprayed on entire aboveground wheat plants during heading stage to medium milk development stage. Plant sample analyses after harvest indicated that both the biomass yield and grain yield were negatively affected by Cd application (p < 0.05); compared to controls, leaf and grain Cd concentrations increased 187-547% and 26.3-91.8%, respectively. However, grain Cd accumulation (concentration x yield) was not affected by Cd treatments (p > 0.05). Stem, leaf and glume Zn concentrations increased by less than 31%, while grain Zn concentrations were negatively affected by Cd treatments (3.4-34.4% lower than the control). Grain Cu concentrations were also negatively affected by Cd treatments, while grain Pb concentrations were similar between treatments. The antagonistic effect of Cd on grain Zn accumulation may mainly be due to competition for transporters and binding compounds in wheat leaves and stems. Preventing excess Cd from entering aboveground plant tissues should lessen negative plant and potentially animal/human health effects. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据