4.7 Article

Physical model test study on support of super pre-stressed anchor in the mining engineering

期刊

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104833

关键词

Failure process; Physical model test; Super pre-stressed anchor; Rock mechanics; Dynamic disaster

资金

  1. joint Ph.D. program of double first rate construction disciplines of CUMT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increase in mining depths, support problems of anchor such as roof accidents and large deformation of soft rock are becoming more and more prominent. Whether the anchor is suitable for deep roadway support has been questioned. In order to explore this problem, this paper studies the ultimate support effect of super pre-stressed anchors. Based on current higher prestress support technology in mining engineering, a support scheme of super anchor is proposed and investigated. In this work, the super anchor scheme and the other two schemes were compared and analysed through a physical model test. The model's displacement data was recorded by a high-speed camera. Meanwhile, the numerical model with the same conditions is calculated. The results show that, the super anchor scheme can improve the stress distribution of the surrounding rock; and this method contributes to the optimization of the support parameters and improves the roof bearing capacity. In addition, the super anchor scheme has a smaller scope of damage than the other two schemes. Third, the super anchor scheme reduces the number of anchors without reducing the strength of the support, which is beneficial to the rapid excavation of the roadway. However, it is worth noting that, the end of the super anchor will produce significant stress concentration in the support process, and this easily leads to the separation and crack of the roof near the end of the super anchor. In short, the physical model test shows that, using super pre-stressed anchors is promising for solving the extremely difficult deep roadway support problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据