4.7 Article

Private landlords and energy efficiency: Evidence for policymakers from a large-scale study in the United Kingdom

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111446

关键词

Landlords; Private rented sector; Residential sector; Energy-saving; Energy efficiency; Retrofit

资金

  1. Imperial College London, through an ESRC Impact Acceleration Account grant [ES/M500562/1]
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) under the Science and Solutions for a Changing Planet Doctoral Training Programme (DTP)
  3. DTP training grant [NE/L002515/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy use in British homes is a significant contributor to national greenhouse gas emissions, and the improvement of energy efficiency in residential buildings has long been an important topic in policy discussions. The lack of investment in energy-saving measures is particularly challenging in the private rented sector, and there are significant research and data gaps in understanding the retrofit behaviour of private landlords. In this study, we present the results of a detailed survey on retrofit behaviour of 1069 British private landlords. The survey assesses the engagement of landlords with 18 different energy efficiency measures, as well as their attitudes, perceptions, norms and a number of other characteristics. We use the data collected in the survey to produce 7 behavioural typologies of landlord retrofitters, by clustering respondents based on their sociodemographic and business characteristics. In addition to providing descriptive evidence of landlords' retrofit behaviour, our results reveal a number of opportunities for segmenting the landlord population into target groups for future policy interventions. By tailoring retrofit incentives to the needs and motivations of these groups, policy-makers can effectively engage landlords with specific energy-saving technologies, increasing the likelihood of retrofit uptake and accelerating the transition to an energy-efficient private rented sector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据