4.7 Article

Dual-pressure condensation high temperature heat pump system for waste heat recovery: Energetic and exergetic assessment

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112997

关键词

Dual-pressure condensation; High temperature heat pump; Waste heat recovery; Thermal matching; Refrigerant selection; Energetic and exergetic analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806151]
  2. Innovation Team of Cold Chain Units, Energy Saving and Cold Storage of College and University of Tianjin Municipality [TD13-5088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High temperature heat pump (HTHP) is an energy-saving solution to recover the industrial waste heat. Five configurations of dual-pressure condensation HTHP are proposed and studied to improve thermal matching in the heat sink. The energy and exergy models are established, and the performance of dual-pressure condensation HTHP systems is assessed and compared with that of traditional single-stage, two-stage and cascade HTHP systems in detail. The results show that the dual-pressure condensation HTHP system is superior to traditional HTHP system from the perspective of energy efficiency and exergetic performance. A maximum COP is obtained at the optimum intermediate water temperature. The COP of dual-pressure condensation water-cooled saturated system (DWSAS) is the highest of 4.16, and 3.37-9.34% higher than the traditional HTHPs. R1234ze(Z) shows much higher energy efficiency over the other refrigerants for the applications of HTHP, and the COP is 2.62-4.47% larger than using R600a at the outlet temperature of heat source of 15-35 degrees C. The exergy destruction is also significantly reduced by using dual-pressure condensation HTHPs due to the improvement of thermal matching in the condensers. DWSAS shows the lowest exergy destruction, which is 4.28-19.35% lower than traditional HTHPs. DWSAS by using R1234ze(Z) is recommended due to its outstanding energetic and exergetic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据