4.7 Article

Pyrolysis behavior and product distributions of biomass six group components: Starch, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, protein and oil

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112777

关键词

Biomass component; Pyrolysis; Kinetics; TG-FTIR; Py-GC/MS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576294, 21706287]
  2. Taishan Scholar Foundation of Young Expert [tsqn201812028]
  3. CAS Key Laboratory of Carbon Materials [KLCMKFJJ2013]
  4. Qingdao Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [16-6-2-51-nsh, 18-6-1101-nsh]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [18CX05022A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pyrolysis of more biomass group components should be studied in order to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of various biomass pyrolysis. In this study, chemical properties of six biomass group components, namely, starch, cellulose, Hemicellulose (Hem), lignin, protein and oil, were evaluated and their pyrolysis behavior, gaseous product evolution, kinetics and product distributions were investigated using TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. The results indicated that their devolatilization sensitivity to heating rate followed the order of Hem > starch > oil > cellulose approximate to protein > lignin. Kinetic results revealed that it was difficult to pyrolyze for biomass rich in oil and lignin but easy to pyrolyze for biomass rich in cellulose, starch, Hem and protein. During their pyrolysis, polysaccharides (starch, cellulose and Hem) mainly generated oxygen-containing components such as C=O and O-heterocycles; lignin mainly contributed to the formation of phenols (up to 81.4%); protein produced nitrogen-containing components (up to 52.71%), including N-heterocycles, pyrroles, pyridines, nitriles, and amines/amides; oil generated large quantities of alkenes (46.48%). Finally, this research would serve to gain further insight into biomass pyrolysis containing different group components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据