4.7 Article

A fully decentralized dual consensus method for carbon trading power dispatch with wind power

期刊

ENERGY
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117634

关键词

Distributed/decentralized optimization; Optimal power dispatch; Wind power integration; Carbon emission trading; Finite-time average consensus

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFE0208400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51977082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global-based and partition-based dynamic power dispatch problems with wind power integrated into the carbon emission trading system are established and investigated. To meet this challenge, a distributed dual consensus algorithm based the alternating direction method of multipliers is implemented by sharing Lagrangian multipliers associated with coupling constraints between partitioned subproblems rather than phase angles on adjacent buses that are usually shared, thus protecting the key private information of each subsystem. Furthermore, a fully decentralized algorithm is proposed by adopting the finite-time average consensus algorithm, which enables each partition to iteratively approach a consensus of its shared information in a finite number of steps. For comparison purposes, a global-based centralized optimization is implemented at first, adopting the effect of carbon price on the operation of a modified IEEE-30 bus system, followed by tests of the proposed algorithms with three different partitioning methods of power systems. Results illustrate that a higher carbon price can be regarded as an incentive to decrease the wind curtailment rates and spur the increased use of clean fuel. Compared with the results of the centralized optimization, both the algorithms can achieve satisfactory convergence accuracies, although the fully decentralized algorithm requires slightly longer time for computation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据