4.5 Article

Leveraging Demand Flexibility by Exploiting Prosumer Response to Price Signals in Microgrids

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en13123078

关键词

heuristic approach; energy storage systems; flexible demand; microgrids; model predictive control; renewable energy resources; retail tariffs

资金

  1. Interdepartmental Centre Giorgio Levi Cases, NEBULE project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diffusion of distributed energy resources in distribution networks requires new approaches to exploit the users' capabilities of providing ancillary services. Of particular interest will be the coordination of microgrids operating as an aggregate of demand and supply units. This work reports a model predictive control (MPC) application in microgrids for the efficient energy management of energy storage systems and photovoltaic units. The MPC minimizes the economic cost of aggregate prosumers into a prediction horizon by forecasting generation and absorption profiles. The MPC is compared in realistic conditions with a heuristic strategy that acts in a instant manner, without taking into account signals prediction. The work aims at investigating the effect that different types of energy tariffs have in enhancing the end-users' flexibility, based on three examples of currently applied tariffs, comparing the two storage control modes. The MPC always achieves a better solution than the heuristic approach in all considered scenarios from the cost minimization point of view, with an improvement that is amplified by increasing the energy price variations between peak and off-peak periods. Furthermore, the MPC approach provides a cost saving when compared to the case considering a microgrid endowed with only photovoltaic units, in which no storage is installed. Findings in this work confirm that storage units better perform when some knowledge of future demand and supply trends is provided, ensuring an economic cost saving and an important service for the overall community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据