4.5 Article

Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Beechwood. Part 2: Quantification of Cellulase Inhibitors and Their Effect on Avicel Hydrolysis

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 13, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en13143638

关键词

steam explosion pretreatment; enzymatic hydrolysis; inhibition; HMF; phenolics; furfural

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [406640_136712]
  2. Polish National Centre for Research and Development - Human Capital Operational Program [UDA-POKL-04.03.00-00-042/12-00]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [406640_136712] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomass pretreatment is a mandatory step for the biochemical conversion of lignocellulose to chemicals. During pretreatment, soluble compounds are released into the prehydrolyzate that inhibit the enzymatic hydrolysis step. In this work, we investigated how the reaction conditions in steam explosion pretreatment of beechwood (severity: 3.0-5.25; temperature: 160-230 degrees C) influence the resulting amounts of different inhibitors. Furthermore, we quantified the extent of enzyme inhibition during enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel in the presence of the prehydrolyzates. The amounts of phenolics, HMF, acetic acid and formic acid increased with increasing pretreatment severities and maximal quantities of 21.6, 8.3, 43.7 and 10.9 mg/g(beechwood), respectively, were measured at the highest severity. In contrast, the furfural concentration peaked at a temperature of 200 degrees C and a severity of 4.75. The presence of the prehydrolyzates in enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel lowered the glucose yields by 5-26%. Mainly, the amount of phenolics and xylose and xylooligomers contributed to the reduced yield. As the maximal amounts of these two inhibitors can be found at different conditions, a wide range of pretreatment severities led to severely inhibiting prehydrolyzates. This study may provide guidelines when choosing optimal pretreatment conditions for whole slurry enzymatic hydrolysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据