4.5 Article

The Human TSHβ Subunit Proteins and Their Binding Sites on the TSH Receptor Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 161, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa125

关键词

molecular dynamics; hydrogen bonds; thyroid stimulating hormone; splice variant

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [DK069713]
  2. Veterans Administration Merit Award [BX000800]
  3. Segal Family Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To gain further insight into the binding of the normal and variant human TSH beta subunits (TSH beta and TSH beta v), we modeled the 2 monomeric proteins and studied their interaction with the TSH receptor ectodomain (TSHR-ECD) using molecular dynamics simulation Furthermore, analyzed their bioactivity in vitro using recombinant proteins to confirm that such binding was physiologically relevant. Examining the interaction of TSH beta and TSH beta v with the TSHR-ECD model using molecular dynamic simulation revealed strong binding of these proteins to the receptor ECD. The specificity of TSH beta and TSH beta v binding to the TSHR-ECD was examined by analyzing the hydrogen-bonding residues of these subunits to the FSH receptor ECD, indicating the inability of these molecules to bind to the FSH receptors. Furthermore, the modelling suggests that TSH beta and TSH beta v proteins clasped the concave surface of the leucine rich region of the TSHR ECD in a similar way to the native TSH using dynamic hydrogen bonding. These mutually exclusive stable interactions between the subunits and ECD residues included some high-affinity contact sites corresponding to binding models of native TSH. Furthermore, we cloned TSH beta and TSH beta v proteins using the entire coding ORF and purified the flag-tagged proteins. The expressed TSH beta subunit proteins retained bioactivity both in a coculture system as well as with immune-purified proteins. In summary, we showed that such interactions can result in a functional outcome and may exert physiological or pathophysiological effects in immune cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据