4.6 Article

Effects of N and O groups for oxygen reduction reaction on one- and two-dimensional carbonaceous materials

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136052

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNPq [303351/2018-7, 405742/2018-5]
  2. Fundect -MS [59/300.184/2016]
  3. CAPES -PRINT [88881.311799/2018-01]
  4. PNPD -CAPES
  5. CAPES [88881.131904/2016-01]
  6. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2017/10118-0, 2019/04421-7]
  7. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior e Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  8. Estonian Research Council [PRG723]
  9. EU through the European Regional Development Fund [TK141]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is greatly affected by the morphology as well as the elemental composition of the nitrogen-doped carbon-based electrocatalysts. Thus, this work focuses on: (i) nitrogen doping of different graphene-based materials (two-dimensional materials: chemically converted graphene, graphene oxide, and commercially available graphene, and one-dimensional material: graphene nanoribbons) that differ from each other by morphology as well as elemental composition and (ii) studying the ORR performance of these N-doped carbonaceous catalysts in alkaline medium. The nitrogen doping is achieved by low-cost synthetic method based on hydrothermal treatment at mild conditions. The results indicate that: (i) nitrogen doping is dependent on the carbonaceous substrate used and (ii) these N-doped graphene-based catalysts vary drastically by the electrocatalytic activity for ORR as well as the selectivity for HO2- and OH- production in alkaline medium. Roughly, predominantly was produced on two-dimensional graphene-based catalysts enriched with low nitrogen content (0.9-1.4 at.%) and mostly OH- was formed on graphene nanoribbons as one-dimensional catalyst containing low amount of nitrogen (2.1 at.%). This work is valuable for giving further insights to the ORR performance on N-doped graphene-based nanocarbons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据