4.7 Article

Long-term stabilization of Cd in agricultural soil using mercapto-functionalized nano-silica (MPTS/nano-silica): A three-year field study

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110600

关键词

Cadmium; Field study; Nano-silica; Stabilization; Wheat; Agricultural soil

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51704093]
  2. Open Funding Project of National Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering [SYFD180051810K, 614222207041813]
  3. First-class disciplines innovation team training projects in Henan University [2018YLTD16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cadmium (Cd) contamination in agricultural soil is a worldwide environmental problem. In situ stabilization has been considered an effective approach for the remediation of Cd-contaminated agricultural soil. However, information about the long-term effects of amendment on soil properties and stabilization efficiency remains limited. In the present study, mercapto-functionalized nano-silica (MPTS/nano-silica) was used to stabilize Cd in contaminated agricultural soil under field conditions for three years (with application rates of 0%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8% and 1.0%). The application of MPTS/nano-silica reduced the soil aggregate stability (PDA(0.25)) (14.8%) and available K (24.9%) and significantly increased the soil dehydrogenase (DHA) (43.4%), yield of wheat grains (33.5%) and Si content in wheat tissues (55.2% in leaf, 50.4% in stem, and 37.7% in husk) (p < 0.05). More importantly, MPTS/nano-silica decreased the leachability (36.0%) and bioavailability (54.3%) of Cd in the soil and transformed Cd into a more stable fraction. The content of Cd in wheat grains decreased by 53.9%, 61.9% and 54.1% in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, in comparison with the control. These results indicated that MPTS/nano-silica has long-term stabilization effects on Cd in agricultural soil and is a potential amendment for the remediation of Cd-contaminated agricultural soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据