4.6 Article

Microvascular Function Contributes to the Relation Between Aortic Stiffness and Cardiovascular Events The Framingham Heart Study

期刊

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004979

关键词

arteries; cardiovascular diseases; endothelium; pulse wave analysis; vascular stiffness

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study [N01-HC-25195, HHSN268201500001I, HL076784, AG028321, HL070100, HL060040, HL080124, HL071039, HL077447, HL107385, HL126136, HL128914, 2-K24-HL04334]
  2. UNCF/Merck Science Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Arterial dysfunction contributes to cardiovascular disease (CVD) progression and clinical events. Interrelations of aortic stiffness and vasodilator function with incident CVD remain incompletely studied. Methods and Results We used proportional hazards models to relate individual measures of vascular function to incident CVD in 4547 participants (mean age, 51 +/- 11 years; 54% women) in 2 generations of Framingham I Ieart Study participants. During follow-up (0,02-13,83 years), 232 participants (5%) experienced new-onset CVD events, In multivariable models adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, both higher carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (hazard ratio [HR], 1,32; 95% confidence interval ICU 1.07-1.63; P=0,01) and lower hyperemic mean flow velocity (HR, 0,84; 95% CI, 0.71-0,99; P=0,04) were associated significantly with incident CVD, whereas primary pressure wave amplitude (HR, 1,12; 95% CI, 0.99-1,27; P=0,06), baseline brachial diameter (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0,90-1,31; P=0,39), and flow-mediated vasodilation (11R, 0,85; 95% CI, 0,69-1,04; P=0.12) were not. In mediation analyses, 8% to 13% of the relation between aortic stiffness and CVD events was mediated by hyperemic mean flow velocity. Conclusions Our results suggest that associations between aortic stiffness and CVD events are mediated by pathways that include microvascular damage and remodeling,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据