4.7 Review

Constraining assembly time of some blocks on eastern margin of Pangea using Permo-Triassic non-marine tetrapod records

期刊

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103215

关键词

Pangea; East Asia; Assembly Permian; Triassic; Non-marine tetrapods

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB26000000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41572019, 41661134047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The supercontinent Pangea was mainly formed during the Permian, but when it reached maximum land is unsure because the configuration of the East Asian blocks during the Permo-Triassic is still highly debated. Fossil tetrapods provide one of the best calibrations to the time of connection between continents, but the data of Permo-Triassic tetrapods have rarely been applied in the previous reconstructions. Here we review the oldest records of non-marine tetrapods on the East Asia blocks and use them to discuss the timing of connection between continents during the Permian and Triassic. The distribution of Seymouriamorpha shows the Kazakhstanian was connected to the Baltica by land from the Cisuralian. The diverse Dashankou Fauna indicates that the Alxa Block amalgamated to Pangea at least in the Guadalupian (older than 266 Ma). The questionable footprints and late Permian dicynodont assemblage from the North China show the North China Craton may have been connected to the main part of Pangea from the Guadalupian, and became part of Pangea at least by 256 Ma. The late Permian Laotian tetrapods support the hypothesis that the South China Block already collided with the North China and the Indochina blocks by the end of the Permian, and there was a land route for the migration of non-marine tetrapods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据