4.7 Article

A record of the δ44/40Ca and [Sr] of seawater over the last 100 million years from fossil elasmobranch tooth enamel

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 543, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116354

关键词

calcium isotopes; Sr/Ca; elasmobranch teeth; marine calcium cycle; seawater chemistry

资金

  1. Scott Vertebrate Paleontology Fund (Princeton University)
  2. National Science Foundation Sedimentary Geology and Paleobiology Award [1830581, 1830480]
  3. American Chemical Society Award Petroleum Research Fund Undergraduate New Investigator Grant [54852-UNI2]
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [1830480] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1830581] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global geochemical cycles of calcium and strontium in seawater link the chemical composition of the oceans to the global carbon cycle and Earth's climate through the precipitation, diagenetic alteration, and sedimentary recycling of marine carbonate minerals. Here we present a record of calcium isotopic composition and [Sr] of seawater over the last 100 million years using measurements from modern and fossil shark teeth. Although there is significant variability in modern elasmobranch tooth enamel associated with physiology and diet, our record suggests a first-order increase in the average calcium isotopic composition of seawater by 0.5 parts per thousand and a decline in Sr/Ca ratios of similar to 40% over the last 100 million years. These observations are in agreement with trends seen in other archives. We propose that the observed changes in both the calcium isotopic composition and Sr concentration of seawater can be explained by changes in the partitioning of the global carbonate sink associated with the development of a deep-sea carbonate reservoir in the mid-Mesozoic. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据