4.0 Article

Optimal Surface Preparation for Wood Anatomy Research of Invasive Species by Scanning Electron Microscopy

期刊

DRVNA INDUSTRIJA
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 117-127

出版社

ZAGREB UNIV, FAC FORESTRY
DOI: 10.5552/drvind.2020.1958

关键词

wood anatomy; wood surface; scanning electron microscopy; SEM invasive species; sample preparation

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund through the Urban Innovative Actions Initiative [UIA02-228]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency [P4-0015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research was done to develop the optimal method of wood surface preparation scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Since 2018, environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM (TM)) FEI Quanta 250 has been installed at the Department of Wood Science and Technology in Ljubljana. We tested several methods For the pre-preparation and cutting of wood surfaces for SEW analyses. The samples had been either dried, soaked in water and frozen, impregnated with paraffin or simply moistened before cutting. We analysed wood surfaces obtained by splitting, sawing, planing, sanding and cutting on a sliding microtome with different blades. The effect of gold coating on the SEM image quality was also evaluated. Best results were obtained by cutting a pre-moistened surface on a sliding microtome with a low profile replaceable blade and gold coated afterwards. Determined methodology is technically less demanding, not time consuming and obtains results that satisfy needs for wood anatomy research at magnifications up to 12.000x. Guidelines for the optimal preparation of samples were prepared, and theoretical and practical basis for investigations of wood anatomy using SEM were provided. The method was afterwards used in analyses of invasive alien plant species investigating their anatomical structure in the framework of the AlienPLAntSpEcies - APPLAUSE project-(Urban Innovative Actions initiative). It was demonstrated that the use of the SEM opened new scope in detailed investigations of the wood structure and properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据