4.6 Article

Facile fabrication and capacitive performance of hierarchical porous reduced graphene oxide

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2020.107882

关键词

Reduced graphene oxide; Hierarchical porous structure; Facile fabrication; Iron nitrate; Capacitive property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) [U1304203]
  2. 111 Project (CN) [B12015]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (CN) [162300410258]
  4. College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (CN) [201910459177]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benefitting from its unique characteristics, graphene has been considered as one of promising electrode material candidates for supercapacitors. Nevertheless, the accessible specific surface area for the charge storage in electrodes and the solvated ion transport in electrolyte are seriously deteriorated in the conventional graphene, leading to the poor rate capability and low specific capacitance. Thus, it is urgent to construct a hierarchical porous structure with suitable surface area for graphene to enhance its capacitive performance. In this work, a facile freeze drying-calcination strategy is adopted to fabricate hierarchical porous reduced graphene oxide (p-rGO) by using Fe(NO3)(3) as activator. The etching effect is optimized by adjusting the dosage of Fe(NO3)(3) applied. Compared with the pristine rGO, the resultant p-rGO delivers better capacitive performance, whose specific capacitance reaches 210.1 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1) in the three-electrode system with 6.0 M KOH solution as electrolyte. Moreover, the p-rGO-3 based symmetric supercapacitor possesses an energy density of 21.54 Wh kg(-1) at a power density of 160.42 W kg(-1), and exhibits superior electrochemical stability even after 10,000 charge-discharge cycles. The enhanced capacitive performance is presumably contributed by the hierarchical porous architecture and the doping of nitrogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据