4.7 Article

Fouling characteristics of dissolved organic matter in fresh water and seawater compartments of reverse electrodialysis under natural water conditions

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 496, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114478

关键词

Dissolved organic matter; Fouling characteristics; Fresh water compartment; Reverse electrodialysis; Salinity gradient power generation; Seawater compartment

资金

  1. Research and Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER) [C0-2408]
  2. basic research program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2018R1D1A1B07044718]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fouling characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the fresh water and seawater compartments of the reverse electrodialysis (RED) system were investigated under natural water conditions. The salinity gradient power generation was governed monovalent ions whereas multivalent ions strongly contributed to the fouling formation of the ion-exchange membranes (IEMs). The partial deposition of DOM within the membrane pores during its passage from the fresh water compartment to the seawater compartment facilitated the fouling formation of the IEMs. Despite of the similar DOC losses in fresh water (DOC loss = 20%) and seawater (DOC loss = 22%) through the RED system, the colour variations of the anion-exchange membranes (AEMs) and spacers in contact with fresh water were more noticeable than those in contact with seawater. These results indicate that the deposition of hydrophobic DOM components onto the AEM surfaces water may lead to the increases in the pressure drop of the fresh water compartment and the decreases in the power density of the RED system. Therefore, an appropriate pre-treatment strategy capable of mitigating membrane fouling by hydrophobic DOM components seemed to be indispensable to maintain constantly the performance of the RED system under natural water conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据