Comparison of umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells isolated from cryopreserved material and extracted by explantation and digestion methods utilizing a split manufacturing model

Background aims: Umbilical cord (UC) tissue is recognized as an advantageous source of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), whose therapeutic properties are being actively evaluated in pre-clinical and clinical trials. In recognition of its potential value, storage of UC tissue or cells from UC tissue in newborn stem cell banks is now commonplace; however, strategies for isolating UC-derived MSCs (UCMSCs) from UC tissue have not been standardized. The majority of newborn stem cell banks take one of two approaches to cord tissue processing and cryopreservation: enzymatic digestion of the fresh tissue with cryopreservation of the subsequent cell suspension or cryopreservation of the tissue as a composite whole with later, post-thaw isolation of cells by explantation. Evaluation of UCMSCs derived by these two principal preparation and cryopreservation strategies is important to understanding whether the methods currently employed by newborn stem cell banks retain the desirable clinical attributes of UC cells. Methods: UCMSCs were isolated from 10 UC tissue samples by both explantation and enzymatic digestion methods to allow for comparison of cells from the same donor. Cell isolates from both methods were compared pre- and post-cryopreservation as well as after serial passaging. Cell viability, morphology, growth kinetics, immunophenotype, cytokine secretion and differentiation capacity were evaluated. Results: UCMSCs could be derived from fresh UC tissue by both explantation and digestion methods and from thawed UC tissue by explantation. Initial cell populations isolated by digestion were heterogeneous and took longer to enrich for UCMSCs in culture than populations obtained by explantation. However, once isolated and enriched, UCMSCs obtained by either method showed no significant difference in viability, morphology, rate of proliferation, surface marker expression, levels of cytokine secretion or differentiation capacity. Conclusions: Derivation of UCMSCs by explantation after thawing UC cryopreserved as a composite tissue may be favorable in terms of initial purity and number of cells achievable by a specific passage. However, we observed no evidence of functional difference between UCMSCs derived by explanation or digestion, suggesting that cells isolated from cryopreserved material obtained by either method maintain their therapeutic properties. (C) 2020 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.