4.5 Article

Autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for no-option critical limb ischemia is limited by karyotype abnormalities

期刊

CYTOTHERAPY
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 313-321

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.02.007

关键词

abnormal karyotype; chronic limb-threatening ischemia; critical limb ischemia; mesenchymal stromal cells; phase 1 clinical trial

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland/Health Research Board (SFI/HRB) Translational Research Award [TRA201115]
  2. NUIG, School of Medicine PhD Scholarship
  3. HRB Clinical Research Facility Galway(CRFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe manifestation of peripheral vascular disease. Revascularization is the preferred therapy, but it is not achievable in 25%-40% of patients due to diffuse anatomic distribution of the disease or medical comorbidities. No-option CLI represents an unmet medical need. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may provide salvage therapy through their angiogenic and tissue-trophic properties. This article reports a phase lb clinical study examining the safety and feasibility of intramuscular transplantation of autologous bone-marrow MSCs for patients with no-option CLI. Methods: Twelve patients were enrolled in the clinical trial, and nine proceeded to bone marrow aspiration and culture expansion of MSCs. Results: A high rate of karyotype abnormality (>30%) was detected in the produced cell batches, resulting in failure of release for clinical administration. Four patients were treated with the investigational medicinal product (IMP), three with a low dose of 20 x 10(6) MSCs and one with a mid-dose of 40 x 10(6) MSCs. There were no serious adverse events related to trial interventions, including bone marrow aspiration, IMP injection or therapy. Conclusions: The results of this trial conclude that an autologous cell therapy approach with MSCs for critical limb ischemia is limited by the high rate of karyotype abnormalities. (C) 2020 International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据