4.3 Article

OMIP-065: Dog Immunophenotyping and T-Cell Activity Evaluation with a 14-Color Panel

期刊

CYTOMETRY PART A
卷 97, 期 10, 页码 1024-1027

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24168

关键词

dogs; T cells; immunophenotyping; PBMCs; high-dimensional cytometry; canine; cross-reactivity; translational research

资金

  1. Cancer research Switzerland/Krebsforschung Schweiz [KFS-4146-02-2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose and Appropriate Sample Types Companion dogs are increasingly recognized as large-animal models of diseases such as cancer, infectious-, inflammatory-, or autoimmune diseases. At the same time, compared to human clinics, veterinarians have only a fraction of the treatment options available. To study the immunological aspects of canine diseases and ultimately develop or adapt human treatments for the dog, the methodology also needs to be in place. Such tools include robust and reliable flow cytometric panels. The purpose of the panel described here is to assess the immune cell composition and their functionality in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of dogs. Moreover, its plug and play composition allows for an in-depth analysis of T-cell responses in ex vivo assays (Table 1). Initially, this panel has been designed for the analysis of cryopreserved PBMCs to allow batched analysis and to reduce interexperimental variation. Withers and colleagues published a comparable and-to our knowledge-currently the most extensive canine panel to date (1). While their study focused on the aging and activation status of T cells in dogs, our panel is designed to look at a broader range of cells with a higher number of markers. This allows a more in-depth analysis of functional extracellular and intracellular markers. In addition, all antibodies in our proposed panel are directly labeled. In combination with suitable lymphocyte isolation protocols, this panel could potentially also be adapted to analyze tissue biopsies from various different organs. (c) 2020 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据