4.2 Article

Elaboration of Novel TTK1 Inhibitory Leads via QSAR-Guided Selection of Crystallographic Pharmacophores Followed By In Vitro Assay

期刊

CURRENT COMPUTER-AIDED DRUG DESIGN
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 511-522

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1573409916666200611122736

关键词

Structure-based drug design; checkpoint kinase TTK; QSAR analysis; molecular modeling; IC50

资金

  1. deanship of Scientific Research at the Zarqa University [6/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TTK1 is a key regulator of chromosome segregation and targeting it has become a focus for enhancing anticancer therapies. By combining QSAR modeling with physicochemical descriptors, significant TTK1 inhibitors were discovered and 5 new inhibitors were identified in the NCI database using the resulting pharmacophore and QSAR models.
Introduction: Tyrosine threonine kinase (TTK1) is a key regulator of chromosome segregation. Recently, TTK targeting came into focus for the enhancement of possible anticancer therapies. Objective: In this regard, we employed our well-known method of QSAR-guided selection of the best crystallographic pharmacophore(s) to discover considerable binding interactions that transfer inhibitors into TTK1 binding site. Methods: Sixty-one TTK1 crystallographic complexes were used to extract 315 pharmacophore hypotheses. QSAR modeling was subsequently used to choose a single crystallographic pharmaco-phore that, when combined with other physicochemical descriptors, elucidates discrepancy in bio-activity of 55 miscellaneous inhibitors. Results: The best QSAR model was robust and predictive (r2(55) = 0.75, r2LOO = 0.72 , r2press against external testing list of 12 compounds = 0.67), Standard error of estimate (training set) (S)= 0.63 , Standard error of estimate (testing set)(Stest) = 0.62. The resulting pharmacophore and QSAR models were used to scan the National Cancer Institute (NCI) database for new TTK1 inhibitors. Conclusion: Five hits confirmed significant TTK1 inhibitory profiles with IC50 values ranging be-tween 11.7 and 76.6 mM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据