4.8 Article

Microtubule Growth Rates Are Sensitive to Global and Local Changes in Microtubule Plus-End Density

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 15, 页码 3016-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.05.056

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [2P20GM103432]
  2. NIGMS [R01GM113028]
  3. Whitman Center fellowships at the Marine Biological Laboratory
  4. Biomedical Scholars program of the Pew Charitable Trusts
  5. National Xenopus Resource at the Marine Biological Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microtubule cytoskeleton plays critically important roles in numerous cellular functions in eukaryotes, and it does so across a functionally diverse and morphologically disparate range of cell types [1]. In these roles, microtubule assemblies must adopt distinct morphologies and physical dimensions to perform specific functions [2-5]. As such, these macromolecular assemblies-as well as the dynamics of the individual microtubule polymers from which they are made-must scale and change in accordance with cell size, geometry, and function. Microtubules in cells typically assemble to a steady state in mass, leaving enough of their tubulin subunits soluble to allow rapid growth and turnover. This suggests some negative feedback that limits the extent of assembly, for example, decrease in growth rate, or increase in catastrophe rate, as the soluble subunit pool decreases. Although these ideas have informed the field for decades, they have not been observed experimentally. Here, we describe the application of an experimental approach that combines cell-free extracts with photo-patterned hydrogel micro-enclosures as a means to investigate microtubule dynamics in cytoplasmic volumes of defined size and shape. Our measurements reveal a negative correlation between microtubule plus-end density and microtubule growth rates and suggest that these rates are sensitive to the presence of nearby growing ends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据