4.7 Review

X-ray fluorescence application in food, feed, and agricultural science: a critical review

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
卷 61, 期 14, 页码 2340-2350

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1776677

关键词

X-ray fluorescence; food safety; food nutrition; plant; soil; crop; advantage; disadvantage

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. Ministry of Agriculture Strategic Research Chair (PY) Program
  3. University of Saskatchewan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray fluorescence techniques have been increasingly utilized in food and agricultural science, offering advantages such as minimal sample preparation, nondestructive analysis, and high spatial resolution. Further advancements in technology, such as detector development and combination with chemometrics, hold promising prospects for its future applications in the field.
Recently X-ray fluorescence techniques have been widely used in food and agricultural science areas. Minimal sample preparation, nondestructive analysis, high spatial resolution, and multiple elements measurements within a single sample are among its advantages. In this review, literature of X-ray fluorescence are extensively researched and summarized from food and agricultural science areas focusing on food safety inspection, food nutrition, plant science, soil science, and Ca-related problems in horticultural crops. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of X-ray fluorescence comparing with traditional analytical techniques of elements are also discussed. The more advanced technology such as developments of detector, scanning system, beamline capability among others would significantly increase future application of X-ray fluorescence techniques. Combination use of XRF with other tools such as chemometrics or data analytics would greatly improve its prediction performance. These further improvements offer exciting perspectives for the application of X-ray fluorescence in the food and agricultural science areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据