4.6 Review

Silica-Quantum Dot Nanomaterials as a Versatile Sensing Platform

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 687-708

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408347.2020.1768358

关键词

Combined nanoparticles; quantum dots; sensor; silica

资金

  1. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional analytical methods are limited by high consumption of reagents, time, expensive equipment and complex sample preparation, creating a demand for simple, fast and sensitive procedures. Quantum dots and mesoporous silica nanoparticles have garnered attention for their unique properties and potential in sensor development, offering opportunities for the detection of a wide range of analytes.
Traditional analytical methods are bounded due to required high consumption of reagents, time, expensive equipment and complicated sample preparation. Thus, there is a demand for easy, fast and sensitive procedure to determine various analytes. In this regards, quantum dots (QDs) as fluorescent nanomaterials have attracted considerable attention due to their unique optical properties. Numerous studies have been reported regarding the application of QDs in sensor development for the detection of different analytes. Moreover, mesoporous silica nanoparticles which show ideal properties including biocompatibility, uniform pore size, stability in wide range of pH and an extremely high surface area could offer great opportunity in combination with QDs for the construction of sensing platforms. The fluorescent, chemiluminescent and electrochemical sensors based on silica-QDs materials could be used for the quantitative recognition of an extensive range of analytes like organic compounds, metal cations, toxic industrial compounds, drugs, and biogenic composites. In this review, we have summarized sensors based on combined QD-silica nanomaterials and their applications in the recognition of different analytes which are published over approximately the past five years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据