4.7 Article

Bone segmentation on whole-body CT using convolutional neural network with novel data augmentation techniques

期刊

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103767

关键词

Bone; Segmentation; CT; CNN; U-net; Data augmentation; Mixup; RICAP

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19K17232]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate an algorithm for bone segmentation on whole-body CT using a convolutional neural network (CNN). Methods: Bone segmentation was performed using a network based on U-Net architecture. To evaluate its performance and robustness, we prepared three different datasets: (1) an in-house dataset comprising 16,218 slices of CT images from 32 scans in 16 patients; (2) a secondary dataset comprising 12,529 slices of CT images from 20 scans in 20 patients, which were collected from The Cancer Imaging Archive; and (3) a publicly available labelled dataset comprising 270 slices of CT images from 27 scans in 20 patients. To improve the network's performance and robustness, we evaluated the efficacy of three types of data augmentation technique: conventional method, mixup, and random image cropping and patching (RICAP). Results: The network trained on the in-house dataset achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.983 +/- 0.005 on cross validation with the in-house dataset, and 0.943 +/- 0.007 with the secondary dataset. The network trained on the public dataset achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.947 +/- 0.013 on 10 randomly generated 15-3-9 splits of the public dataset. These results outperform those reported previously. Regarding augmentation technique, the conventional method, RICAP, and a combination of these were effective. Conclusions: The CNN-based model achieved accurate bone segmentation on whole-body CT, with generalizability to various scan conditions. Data augmentation techniques enabled construction of an accurate and robust model even with a small dataset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据