4.7 Article

A time-domain method for load identification using moving weighted least square technique

期刊

COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES
卷 234, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106254

关键词

Load identification; Moving weighted least square; Green's kernel function; Reconstruction of kernel matrix; Regularization method

资金

  1. Key Technologies Research and Development Program, China [2018YFC0808902]
  2. Kone Crane Equipment Co., Ltd.
  3. Shanghai International Port (Group) Co., Ltd.
  4. Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the thought of Green's kernel function method (GKFM), an improved time-domain load identification method using moving weighted least square technique (MWLST) which can accurately fit dynamic load is proposed. Better than the traditional shape function method using moving least square fitting (SFM_MLSF), the proposed method considers continuity and correlation of dynamic load between two adjacent sampling points, and involves the weighted contribution of sampling points to the fitting point. In numerical examples, Gauss, Cubic and Quartic spline weight functions are utilized in the proposed method to realize the reconstruction of kernel matrix. It is found that the accuracies of load identification are almost same when their optimum supported domain radii are adopted. Furthermore, the numerical results illustrate that the proposed method can identify dynamic load more accurately and smoothly than GKFM and SFM_MLSF significantly by the same regularization method for ill-posedness, and the proposed method has excellent stability and robustness. Additionally, a special technique combining both the whole identification and the truncated-processing identification is proposed to identify external dynamic loads during hoisting process, which solves the oscillation problem caused by using inversing methods directly. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据