4.6 Article

Pyramid Channel-based Feature Attention Network for image dehazing

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2020.103003

关键词

Image dehazing; Deep neural network; Channel attention

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61922064]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [LR17F030001, LQ19F020005]
  3. Project of science and technology plans of Wenzhou City, China [C20170008, G20150017, ZG2017016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional deep learning-based image dehazing methods usually use the high-level features (which contain more semantic information) to remove haze in the input image, while ignoring the low-level features (which contain more detail information). In this paper, a Pyramid Channel-based Feature Attention Network (PCFAN) is proposed for single image dehazing, which leverages complementarity among different level features in a pyramid manner with channel attention mechanism. PCFAN consists of three modules: a three-scale feature extraction module, a pyramid channel-based feature attention module (PCFA), and an image reconstruction module. The three-scale feature extraction module simultaneously captures the low-level spatial structural features and the high-level contextual features in different scales. The PCFA module utilizes the feature pyramid and the channel attention mechanism, which effectively extracts interdependent channel maps and selectively aggregates the more important features in a pyramid manner for image dehazing. The image reconstruction module is used to reconstruct features to recover a clear image. Meanwhile, a loss function that combines a mean square error loss part and an edge loss part is employed in PCFAN, which can better preserve image details. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed PCFAN outperforms existing state-of-the-art algorithms on standard benchmark datasets in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and visual effect. The code will be made publicly available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据