4.7 Review

Securing Internet of Medical Things with Friendly-jamming schemes

期刊

COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 431-442

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.06.026

关键词

Internet of medical things; Network security; Friendly jamming

资金

  1. Macao Science and Technology Development Fund [0026/2018/A1]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61971271]
  3. Taishan Scholars Project of Shandong Province [Tsqn20161023]
  4. Primary Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province [2018GGX101018, 2019QYTPY020]
  5. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RG-1435-051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)-enabled e-healthcare can complement traditional medical treatments in a flexible and convenient manner. However, security and privacy become the main concerns of IoMT due to the limited computational capability, memory space and energy constraint of medical sensors, leading to the in-feasibility for conventional cryptographic approaches, which are often computationally-complicated. In contrast to cryptographic approaches, friendly jamming (Fri-jam) schemes will not cause extra computing cost to medical sensors, thereby becoming potential countermeasures to ensure security of IoMT. In this paper, we present a study on using Fri-jam schemes in IoMT. We first analyze the data security in IoMT and discuss the challenges. We then propose using Fri-jam schemes to protect the confidential medical data of patients collected by medical sensors from being eavesdropped. We also discuss the integration of Fri-jam schemes with various communication technologies, including beamforming, Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT) and full duplexity. Moreover, we present two case studies of Fri-jam schemes in IoMT. The results of these two case studies indicate that the Fri-jam method will significantly decrease the eavesdropping risk while leading to no significant influence on legitimate transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据