4.7 Article

A novel Fe2O3@APFS/epoxy composite with enhanced mechanical and thermal properties

期刊

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108146

关键词

Coating; Nano composites; Particle-reinforced composites; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1837205]
  2. Shanghai Aerospace Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project [SAST2018-016]
  3. Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation guiding Plan [201602189]
  4. Dalian Science and Technology Star Project [2017RQ149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Core-shell structured particle contains Fe2O3 as core and amino phenol formaldehyde resin as shell (Fe2O3@APFS) has been synthesized. The results of SEM and TEM test indicate that the obtained Fe2O3@APFS particle is monodisperse and possesses uniform core-shell structure. Its diameter is about 100 nm and the thickness of APFS layer is about 30 nm. The effects of Fe2O3@APFS on the physicochemical properties of cured epoxy composites have been systematically investigated. The cured Fe2O3@APFS/epoxy composites demonstrated enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. A maximum tensile strength of 94.3 MPa was obtained when 4 wt% loading Fe2O3@APFS particles was added. The fracture toughness of epoxy composites with 5 wt% Fe2O3@APFS loading reaches a value of up to 1.71 MPa:m(1/2), which is 80% higher than that of pure epoxy resin. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of cured Fe2O3@APFS/epoxy composites was increased by 13.9 degrees C than that of pure epoxy resin. TEM observation illustrates that Fe2O3@APFS was monodisperse in epoxy matrix. Monodispersion of Fe2O3@APFS, covalent bond linked interface between Fe2O3@APFS and epoxy matrix and synergistic effect of Fe2O3 and APFS were responsible for the enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites. This work provides a new insight into the combination of soft and rigid fillers used to modify polymer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据