4.7 Article

Dynamic compressive behavior of a novel ultra-lightweight cement composite incorporated with rubber powder

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112300

关键词

Rubberized concrete; Cement composite; Lightweight concrete; Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (NSFC) [51708360, 51978407]
  2. Ministry of Guangdong Province Education Office [2017KTSCX164]
  3. Shenzhen Basic Research Project [JCYJ20180305124106675]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper develops a novel rubberized ultra-lightweight high ductility cement composite (RULCC) with added rubber powder and low content PE fiber (0.7%), and investigates the dynamic compressive response and failure mechanism of the RULCC both experimentally and analytically. The WA program examines the dynamic compressive stress-strain relationship of the RULCC through Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) impact tests. The results show that the rubber powder aggregates have significant effect on the compressive strength, stress-strain relations and failure mechanism of the RULCC. A volume replacement of fine aggregates with 5%, 10% and 20% rubber power results in a reduction in static compressive strength by 29.5%, 47.7% and 60.3%, respectively. The RULCC with a low fiber content of 0.7% in volume exhibits a 3% direct tensile strain, and a 4-5% tensile strain can still be achieved after 10% rubber powder is added to the RULCC, showing a high ductility of the material. The SHPB impact WA shows that the compressive strength increases with strain rate. An empirical model, taking into account of the replacement ratio of the rubber powder aggregates in the RULCC, is developed in this paper to evaluate the Dynamic Increasing Factor (DIF). The experimental and analytical studies are essential to better understand the fundamental dynamic behavior of the RULCC for its further applications in engineering applications, such as protective structures, etc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据