4.7 Article

Perforation of needle-punched carbon-carbon composites during high-temperature and high-velocity ballistic impacts

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 245, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112224

关键词

High-temperature high-velocity impact; Perforating prediction; Hierarchical modeling; Needle-punched C/C composite

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11672088]
  2. Foundation of National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Reliability and Environmental Engineering [6142004003-1]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2015CB655200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermal protection systems (TPS) used in spacecraft are likely to be subjected to hypervelocity impacts with debris at the reentry stage. The resultant ultra-high heat flow may damage the payload inside the impacted vehicle. Carbon fiber-reinforced carbon matrix composites are promising materials for TPS, however they have not been extensively evaluated in terms of crashworthiness at high velocities and temperatures. This work describes the impact resistance of 3D needle-punched carbon-carbon (NP-C/C) composites using both numerical and experimental methods. A multiscale-based model has been developed to predict the ballistic limit of NP-C/C composites. Impact experiments have been performed with a custom-made two-stage light gas gun system at 1200 degrees C and also higher temperatures. The test results have been used to validate the post-impact state of the targets obtained from the proposed model. The ballistic limits of the NP-C/C composites have also been identified as functions of the impact velocity, the impactor diameter and the target thickness. The predictions are in good agreement with the experimental data. Low-thickness NP-C/C laminates show similar absorbed energies per unit weight exhibited by same-dimension Inconel panels tested under comparable temperature and speed impacts, although the NP-C/C composites weight 4.4 times less than the analogous metallic panels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据