4.7 Article

Synergistic effects on soot formation in counterflow diffusion flames of acetylene-based binary mixture fuels

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 24-28

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.02.013

关键词

Acetylene flame; Soot; Synergistic effect; Binary fuel mixture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51606136, 51976142, NELM2018A11]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2017VB032]
  3. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports experimental data regarding the effects of the addition of propene and propane in the fuel stream on soot formation in acetylene counterflow diffusion flames. Compared to the baseline acetylene flame, a continuous reduction of soot volume fraction was observed as more propene was mixed in the fuel. However, the addition of 1% propane resulted in an enhancement of soot formation, exhibiting an interesting fuel synergistic effect. The propane-doped flames were seen to have a higher sooting tendency compared to the propene-doped one when the molar doping ratio was less than 5%. These experimental results were rather unexpected considering that propene has a much higher sooting tendency than propane. Through a kinetic simulation accounting for the formation of molecular soot precursors, it is shown that the previous CH3-dominated reaction routes in forming propargyl radicals, which were typically used to rationalize the synergistic effect of ethylene-based binary fuel mixtures, were insufficient to explain the present observation of propane-doped acetylene flame having high sooting tendency than the propene-doped one at low doping ratios. The role of H radicals in the formation of C-4 species (via the paths C2H2 + H -> C2H3 and C2H3 + C2H2 -> n-C4H5) was found to be critical in understanding the sooting behavior of C2H2 flames. (C) 2020 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据