4.7 Article

Visualizing cation treatment effects on frozen clay soils through μCT scanning

期刊

COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103085

关键词

X-ray micro-computed tomography; Cation-treated clay; Frozen soil; Unfrozen water

资金

  1. US Army Corps of Engineers Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) in Hanover, NH
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1147806]
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1147806] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

X-ray micro-computed tomography (mu CT) scanning is a proven technique with applications in geoscience, soil science, and geotechnical engineering. Here we apply the technique to investigate the effects of cation treatments on clayey soil micro-fabric in a frozen state. We imaged six suites of frozen cation-treated soils (montmorillonite, kaolinite, illite, illite-smectite, chlorite, and Copper River heterogeneous soil) at a resolution of 8.17 mu m. Although this resolution was insufficient to observe differences in microaggregate formation as a result of cation treatment, we did observe micro-lenticular ice structures in the smectite-bearing soils that were invisible to the unaided eye. Quantitative analysis of the morphometric parameters from the illite-smectite and Copper River sample suites provided results that supported the visual observations, with the Copper River heterogeneous soil being more frost susceptible than illite-smectite, regardless of cation treatment. The mu CT results of these small soil cores also indicate that within the Copper River suite, the Ca2+-treated and Na+. treated samples are the most and least frost susceptible, respectively, which is in agreement with previous frost heave testing. Results from this study indicate that mu CT morphometric parameters can be used to quantify microlenticular ice lens formation in small samples and to serve as a quality control on sample preparation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据