4.5 Article

A neural network model of basal ganglia's decision-making circuitry

期刊

COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 17-26

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-020-09609-2

关键词

Basal ganglia; Decision making; Neural network

资金

  1. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2018SHZDZX05]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Science [XDB32070100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The basal ganglia play a crucial role in decision making, with neurons reflecting the evidence accumulation process. A neural network model was created to study how the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia interact in decision making, revealing their distinct influences on choices and reaction times.
The basal ganglia have been increasingly recognized as an important structure involved in decision making. Neurons in the basal ganglia were found to reflect the evidence accumulation process during decision making. However, it is not well understood how the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia work together for decision making. Here, we create a recurrent neural network model that is composed of the direct and indirect pathways and test it with the classic random dot motion discrimination task. The direct pathway drives the outputs, which are modulated through a gating mechanism controlled by the indirect pathway. We train the network to learn the task and find that the network reproduces the accuracy and reaction time patterns of previous animal studies. Units in the model exhibit ramping activities that reflect evidence accumulation. Finally, we simulate manipulations of the direct and indirect pathways and find that the manipulations of the direct pathway mainly affect the choice while the manipulations of the indirect pathway affect the model's reaction time. These results suggest a potential circuitry mechanism of the basal ganglia's role in decision making with predictions that can be tested experimentally in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据