4.5 Article

The mystery of missing visits in an emergency cardiology department, in the era of COVID-19.; a time-series analysis in a tertiary Greek General Hospital

期刊

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 109, 期 12, 页码 1483-1489

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-020-01682-1

关键词

Covid19; Emergency cardiological department; Missing visits

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In the era of the current COVID-19 health crisis, the aim of the present study was to explore population behavior as regards the visits in the Epsilon mergency Cardiology department (ECD) of a tertiary General Hospital that does not hospitalize SARS-CoV-2 infected patients Methods and results Daily number of visits at the EDC and admissions to Cardiology Wards and Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary General Hospital, in Athens, Greece, were retrieved from hospital's database (January 1st-April 30th 2018, 2019 and 2020). A highly significant reduction in the visits at ECD of the hospital during March and April 2020 was observed as compared with January and February of the same year (p for linear trend < center dot 001); in particular the number of visits was 41.1% lower in March 2020 and 32.7% lower in April 2020, as compared to January 2020. As the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases throughout the country increased (i.e., from February 26th to April 2nd) the number of visits at ECD decreased (p = 0.01), whereas, the opposite was observed in the period afterwards (p = 0.01).The number of acute Myocardial infarctions (MI) cases in March 2020 was the lowest compared to the entire three year period (p < 0 center dot 001); however, the number of acute MI cases in April 2020 was doubled as compared to March 2020, but still was lower than the preceding years (p < 0 center dot 001). Conclusions It is hard to explain the mystery of the missing emergency hospital visits. However, if this decline in cardiovascular disease related hospital visits is true, it is something that needs to be rigorously studied, to learn how to keep these rates down.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据