期刊
CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 936-945出版社
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.06.021
关键词
Audit; Feedback; Benchmarking; Quality of care; Hospital; Malnutrition
资金
- European Society for Clinical Nutrition (ESPEN)
The annual nutritionDay survey assesses nutrition care in healthcare institutions worldwide, but initial efforts to increase awareness of malnutrition often do not result in specific local remedial actions. To reduce the Knowledge-to-action gap in hospital nutrition care, a new audit and feedback intervention, nutritionDay 2.0, has been developed and implemented. This intervention utilizes quality and economic indicators, feedback, benchmarking, and self-defined action strategies to bridge the gap and improve hospital nutrition care outcomes.
Background & aims: In hospital nutrition care the difficulty of translating knowledge to action often leads to inadequate management of patients with malnutrition. nutritionDay, an annual cross-sectional survey has been assessing nutrition care in healthcare institutions in 66 countries since 2006. While initial efforts led to increased awareness of malnutrition, specific local remedial actions rarely followed. Thus, reducing the Knowledge-to-action (KTA) gap in nutrition care requires more robust and focused strategies. This study describes the strategy, methods, instruments and experience of developing and implementing nutritionDay 2.0, an audit and feedback intervention that uses quality and economic indicators, feedback, benchmarking and self-defined action strategies to reduce the KTA gap in hospital nutrition care. Methods: We used an evidence based multi-professional mixed-methods approach to develop and implement nutritionDay 2.0 This audit and feedback intervention is driven by a Knowledge-to-Action framework complemented with robust stakeholder analysis. Further evidence was synthesized from the literature, online surveys, a pilot study, World Cafe?s and individual expert feedback involving international health care professionals, nutrition care scientists and patients. Results: The process of developing and implementing nutritionDay 2.0 over three years resulted in a new audit questionnaire based on 36 nutrition care quality and economic indicators at hospital, unit and patient levels, a new action-oriented feedback and benchmarking report and a unit-level personalizable action plan template. The evaluation of nutritionDay 2.0 is ongoing and will include satisfaction and utility of nutritionDay 2.0 tools and short-, mid-and long-term effects on the KTA gap. Conclusion: In clinical practice, nutritionDay 2.0 has the potential to promote behavioural and practice changes and improve hospital nutrition care outcomes. In research, the data generated advances knowledge about institutional malnutrition and quality of hospital nutrition care. The ongoing evaluation of the initiative will reveal how far the KTA gap in hospital nutrition care was addressed and facilitate the understanding of the mechanisms needed for successful audit and feedback. clinicaltrials.gov: Identifier: NCT02820246. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据