4.3 Article

Neuroanatomical alterations in higher-order thalamic nuclei of fetuses with Down syndrome

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105870

关键词

Down syndrome; Fetal thalamus; Higher-order nuclei; Cellularity; Projection neurons

资金

  1. Universita di Bologna, Bologna, Italy [RFO2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Down syndrome (DS) is a genetic condition characterized by cognitive disability starting from infancy. Children with DS exhibit deficits in several cognitive domains, including executive function, i.e., a set of cognitive processes that heavily depend on higher-order thalamic nuclei. The goal of this study was to establish whether executive function-related thalamic nuclei of fetuses with DS exhibit neuroanatomical alterations that may contribute to the defects in higher-order control processes seen in children with DS. Patients and Methods: In brain sections from fetuses with DS and control fetuses (gestational week 17-22), we evaluated the cellularity in the mediodorsal nucleus (MD), the centromedian nucleus (CM), and the parafascicular nucleus (PF) of the thalamus and the density of proliferating cells in the third ventricle. Results: We found that all three nuclei had a notably reduced cell density. This defect was associated with a reduced density of proliferating cells in the third ventricle, suggesting that the reduced cellularity in the MD, CM, and PF of fetuses with DS was due to neurogenesis impairment. The separate evaluation of projection neurons and interneurons in the MD, CM, and PF showed that in fetuses with DS the density of projection neurons was reduced, with no changes in interneuron density. Conclusion: This study provides novel evidence for DS-linked cellularity alterations in the MD, CM, and PF and suggests that altered signal processing in these nuclei may be involved in the impairment in higher-order control processes observed in individuals with DS starting from infancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据